Episode 221: Hosts Richard Kyte and Scott Rada tackle one of the most enduring moral questions — how wealth, privilege and authority shape our understanding of fairness.

Kyte argues that many of society’s moral blind spots emerge not from ignorance, but from a state of comfort. “When we’re insulated by prosperity,” he says, “we lose the capacity to recognize suffering — and once that happens, our idea of justice starts to shift.”

The conversation begins with the lingering unease around the Jeffrey Epstein case. Rada notes that the story continues to capture public attention years after Epstein’s death, not because of its lurid details but because it still feels unresolved. Why, they ask, does accountability so often end where power begins?

From there, the discussion widens — tracing the roots of moral perception from ancient philosophy to modern politics. Kyte describes how early Christian thinkers introduced the then-radical idea that all people possess inherent dignity, a belief that ultimately challenged institutions built on exploitation and hierarchy. That framework, he says, remains essential if society hopes to confront modern injustices such as human trafficking, forced labor and homelessness.

Rada presses on the practical side of justice: even when we recognize wrongdoing, why is it so difficult to act? The hosts explore examples close to home, from underfunded public defenders to social systems that keep citizens separated by class. Each instance, they argue, reveals how distance — social, economic and emotional — allows inequity to flourish unnoticed.

The episode also connects with Kyte’s ongoing public lecture series, “The Search for Meaning.”

Episode 220: For decades, the phrase “follow your dream” has been stitched into graduation speeches, greeting cards and social-media pep talks. But what if that familiar advice is doing more harm than good?

Hosts Richard Kyte and Scott Rada challenge one of America’s most cherished bits of wisdom. Drawing inspiration from a syndicated column by journalist Dick Meyer, the pair consider whether the pursuit of a singular passion has left too many people anxious, disillusioned or convinced that ordinary success isn’t enough.

Kyte argues that telling every young person to chase a dream sets them up for frustration.

“Most people don’t have one burning passion at 18,” he said, noting that interests shift and mature over time. Far better, he suggests, to focus on becoming useful, developing skills and finding work that contributes to others’ well-being.

Rada shares his own early ambitions — becoming a baseball announcer or a TV meteorologist — and how those seemingly unattainable dreams eventually resurfaced in unexpected ways.

The hosts also examine the modern pressure on college students to declare majors and find direction early, even as industries change faster than ever. They discuss the idea of a “growth mindset,” coined by psychologist Carol Dweck, which emphasizes adaptability and resilience over fixed talent or destiny. Both agree that in a world reshaped by technology and automation, curiosity may be the most important skill of all.

By the episode’s end, Rada and Kyte reach a thoughtful conclusion: Purpose isn’t a finish line but a moving target. Staying curious, taking on new challenges and investing in relationships often lead to deeper satisfaction than chasing the perfect career ever could.

Episode 219: In the latest episode of The Ethical Life podcast, hosts Richard Kyte and Scott Rada take on one of humanity’s oldest — and least discussed — questions: What is the soul? This episode is part of Kyte’s lecture series, The Search for Meaning.

It’s a timely conversation, released just after All Souls’ Day, yet Kyte points out that few people actually think about what the day commemorates. Instead, Halloween tends to dominate the season’s attention.

Still, belief in something beyond the physical remains nearly universal. Citing a recent Pew Research Center survey, Kyte notes that more than 80 percent of Americans say humans have souls — a rare point of agreement in a divided nation. But if nearly everyone believes, why is the topic so absent from everyday life?

Rada and Kyte explore that paradox. When people stop viewing themselves as souls, Kyte argues, they begin to see themselves only as bodies — and bodies, he says, “are intrinsically pleasure-seeking.” The result is a culture obsessed with comfort and consumption, rather than meaning. Seeing ourselves as souls, he adds, reminds us that fulfillment comes not from pleasure but from purpose.

The conversation moves from theology to psychology, touching on Sigmund Freud’s fascination with the soul despite his atheism. Freud saw the concept as vital language for describing the wholeness of human experience — including the unconscious mind, which can surface unexpectedly through what we now call Freudian slips.

Listeners will also hear Kyte reflect on stories of near-death experiences reported across cultures and history. These moments, he said, can’t be dismissed easily. “When you find a phenomenon that’s widely reported across cultures, it’s not simply a cultural product,” he said.

Rada presses Kyte on whether the mystery itself — not knowing what happens after death — might actually serve us. Kyte thinks it does. “It doesn’t really help us to know exactly what life after death is like,” he said. “What matters is how we live now.”

Episode 218: Hosts Richard Kyte and Scott Rada dig into a question that touches nearly every part of modern existence: What happens when a culture built on making life easier begins to lose the very relationships that make life meaningful?

From dishwashers to digital assistants, the 20th and 21st centuries have delivered one innovation after another designed to save time, reduce effort and simplify daily routines. But as Rada and Kyte note, every bit of friction we remove from life comes with a hidden cost. When we no longer share chores, wait in lines or depend on others for small acts of help, we also weaken the bonds that once held neighbors, co-workers and families together.

Kyte points out that humans have reached an unprecedented moment in history: For the first time, many of us are asking whether we have too much convenience. What began with washing machines and supermarkets has evolved into an on-demand economy that prizes speed above all else. And while few people would want to return to hauling water or scrubbing laundry by hand, the hosts argue that our obsession with efficiency may be quietly reshaping our moral landscape.

Their conversation ranges from the decline of repair culture to the rise of social media and hyperindividualism, connecting the dots between broken appliances, eroded patience and fractured civic trust. The episode also revisits the promise and peril of emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, questioning whether they will truly grant us more leisure or instead fuel new forms of productivity.

Episode 217: Hosts Richard Kyte and Scott Rada tackle a subject that’s easy to overlook — beauty. Not the kind of beauty sold in store aisles or filtered through a cellphone, but the kind that stops us in our tracks and makes us forget, for just a moment, about ourselves.

Kyte recalls a recent camping trip during which he stumbled upon a scene so stunning that he instinctively reached for his phone — only to realize he’d left it behind. What followed, he says, was an experience of pure presence: sunbeams slicing through lifting fog, the quiet steps of deer and the realization that no photograph could ever do it justice.

That moment becomes the starting point for a conversation about how beauty reshapes our sense of meaning and morality. “We spend so much time in our own heads,” Kyte said. “Beauty reminds us there’s something significant outside ourselves.”

It’s an idea that stretches from Ralph Waldo Emerson’s essays on nature to Iris Murdoch’s notion of “unselfing” — the idea that paying attention to something beyond our own desires is the first step toward living ethically.

Rada connects those philosophical ideas to everyday life — including the digital habits that make true attention harder to find. He wonders whether seeing a beautiful image on a four-inch screen counts as the same kind of experience. Kyte doesn’t dismiss the value of photography but insists that beauty can’t be possessed, only encountered.

“The moment we try to capture it, we risk losing it,” he said.

The discussion ranges from foggy forests to still-life paintings, from Emerson’s influence on John Muir to the idea that even the way we see other people changes when we cultivate reverence. Along the way, the hosts wrestle with one provocative question: If we begin to see beauty everywhere, does it still feel extraordinary?

Episode 216: New research suggests that nearly 90 percent of what we do each day happens automatically. From brushing our teeth to checking our phones, most of our behavior unfolds on autopilot — a revelation that raises profound questions about freedom, morality and modern life.

Hosts Richard Kyte and Scott Rada unpack what it means to live ethically in a world governed by routine. The conversation begins with a surprising scientific finding: people make far fewer conscious choices than they believe. Instead, daily actions are guided by patterns — some helpful, others harmful — that free the mind to focus on bigger challenges. But if so much of our behavior is habitual, how much responsibility do we really bear for our choices?

Kyte argues that good habits can actually enhance freedom. Structure, he says, allows people to think more deeply, create more freely and act with less friction. Yet, as Rada points out, the same routines that provide stability can also trap us. They share examples from work and home — from office clutter to the comfort of travel — to show how small disruptions can expose what we take for granted.

The episode also moves beyond theory. The hosts examine modern behavior through real-world lenses: the rise of GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic, the decline of smoking and the ethics of technological fixes that reshape human impulses. Each example circles back to the same question — when we let external forces modify our conduct, do we surrender something essential about human agency?

Kyte also turns the discussion inward, describing how his own writing process depends less on lofty ambition and more on daily discipline. He admits that finishing a book isn’t about sudden bursts of inspiration but about returning to the work, even for a few minutes, every day.

Goals may give direction, he says, but habits sustain momentum. By building steady, repeatable patterns — scheduling lectures, carving out quiet time and creating small external pressures — he transforms intention into progress. It’s a reminder that lasting growth, ethical or otherwise, rarely comes from grand resolutions but from ordinary routines practiced with purpose.

Episode 215: Hosts Richard Kyte and Scott Rada explore the disconnect between our private expressions of care and the collective anger dominating politics, media and even day-to-day interactions. Drawing on Kyte’s lecture series The Search for Meaning, the conversation centers on how the philosopher St. Augustine shaped Western ideas about moral love — and why those lessons still matter today.

Kyte argues that we can understand a person’s character by what they love most. Yet, he says, modern society often defines people by what they oppose. Political language is filled with words like “fight” and “battle,” turning opponents into enemies rather than neighbors. Rada and Kyte discuss whether it’s still possible to extend goodwill toward those who hold different views, and how to live ethically in a world that often rewards outrage.

They also explore real-life examples that bring philosophy down to earth — from small moments of irritation, like a cyclist breaking the rules of the trail, to deeper reflections on forgiveness and self-control. Rada recounts how a brief flash of frustration turned into a lesson on empathy after one such encounter, while Kyte connects that impulse to the everyday challenge of seeing others as whole people rather than symbols of conflict.

The episode asks listeners to consider what might happen if compassion guided civic life as much as it shapes personal relationships. Would political discussions sound different? Would disagreements become more productive? And what habits — patience, humility, and curiosity — would make that shift possible?

Episode 214: The killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk sent shockwaves across the country, deepening fears that political violence is becoming an entrenched part of American life. While leaders on both sides rushed to cast blame, many ordinary citizens were left with a more practical concern: How can we continue living alongside one another when the divides seem sharper than ever?

Rather than revisiting the politics of the tragedy, hosts Richard Kyte and Scott Rada turn their attention to something both more personal and more universal: the fragile state of social bonds in an era of outrage.

The hosts ask whether trends like geographic sorting — liberals clustering in coastal cities, conservatives concentrating in rural towns — make communities stronger or weaker. They note how this “great sort” may bring comfort and solidarity, but also risks complacency, narrowing the space for neighbors to encounter genuine difference.

The conversation also tackles the culture wars over canceling and censorship. Kyte points out that both the left and right have embraced forms of speech suppression, often under different names. Whether labeled “cancel culture” or “censorship,” both carry the danger of driving unpopular ideas underground, where they often gain more power.

Instead, the hosts argue, persuasion and listening are the healthier alternatives. They highlight unusual pairings — like Ezra Klein and Ben Shapiro engaging in long, civil debate — as models for what’s missing in public life. Such exchanges may not change anyone’s core beliefs, but they can open space for understanding and reduce the tendency to see opponents as irrational or malevolent.

The episode also examines how everyday expressions of political identity — yard signs, slogans on T-shirts, bumper stickers — often do more to end conversations than start them. True free speech, Kyte suggests, isn’t just the right to declare one’s allegiance, but the freedom to ask sincere questions — the kind that can shift perspectives and rebuild trust.