Tick-a-box vs Outcomes - are documented risk assessments necessary?
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
Tick-a-box vs Outcomes - are documented risk assessments necessary?
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
This episode explores the effectiveness or otherwise of rules-based legislation versus principles-based legislation intended for anti-money laundering. Will financial institutions find it easier to apply or not?
A related regulatory requirement is to draft extensive risk assessments. Do we consult them when a risk occurs? Businesses manage their risks anyway - why do they need it to be documented?
An opinion is given on whether the financial impact of money laundering is ever factored into published economic statistics such as GDP.
Join Dawn as she speaks with Louize Hermitage-Holt and Aziz Boghani from The Goose. Connect with Dawn on LinkedIn · The Shepherds of Inequality · Beyond Play
Ce que les auditeurs disent de Tick-a-box vs Outcomes - are documented risk assessments necessary?
Moyenne des évaluations de clientsÉvaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.
Il n'y a pas encore de critiques pour ce titre.