Why reviews lost their sting - and what matters more, the song or the record?
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
Why reviews lost their sting - and what matters more, the song or the record?
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
Our pencil-chewing, critical assessment of this week’s news gets mainly * and *** reviews, among them …
…. Sting v Summers & Copeland over Every Breath You Take, the goose that laid the golden egg
… what John Lennon would have thought about the ‘cancelled’ track on Some Time In New York City
… when did “critically acclaimed” come to mean unpopular?
… the knock-about days when a critic was “a jerk, a crank and a spoilsport”
… Jonny Greenwood’s dad was a bomb disposal expert? Pete Doherty’s mum was a Lance-Corporal in the Royal Army Nursing Corps?
… what matters more, the song or the record?
... Anthony Fantano, Rick Beato and the rise of the YouTube rock review
… “negative comments about a famous act’s new album are like graffiti on the walls of a hallowed institution”
… Bob Dylan’s Self Portrait, Andrew Ridgeley’s Son Of Albert (“half a star”) and the lost age of the crushing review
… and “you never mention Depeche Mode!”
Find out more about how to keep the conversation going: https://www.patreon.com/wordinyourear
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.