
From Bacteria to Bach and Back
The Evolution of Minds
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
Acheter pour 33,40 $
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Tom Perkins
-
Auteur(s):
-
Daniel C. Dennett
À propos de cet audio
What is human consciousness, and how is it possible? This question fascinates thinking people from poets and painters to physicists, psychologists, and philosophers. From Bacteria to Bach and Back is Daniel C. Dennett's brilliant answer, extending perspectives from his earlier work in surprising directions, exploring the deep interactions of evolution, brains, and human culture.
Part philosophical whodunit, part bold scientific conjecture, this landmark work enlarges themes that have sustained Dennett's legendary career at the forefront of philosophical thought. In his inimitable style - laced with wit and arresting thought experiments - Dennett shows how culture enables reflection by installing a bounty of thinking tools, or memes, in our brains. Language, itself composed of memes, turbocharged this interplay. The result, a mind that can comprehend the questions it poses, emerges from a process of cultural evolution.
An agenda-setting book for a new generation of philosophers and other researchers, From Bacteria to Bach and Back will delight and entertain anyone who hopes to understand human creativity in all its wondrous applications.
©2017 Daniel C. Dennett (P)2017 HighBridge, a division of Recorded BooksSolid and Accessible
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.
It is highly recommended.
Very good presentation of this concept
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.
For example, he says Decartes demon is unlikely because the possibility that so many independently thinking people could arrive at the same false conclusion is unlikely. The flaws being (weak reply) unlikely isn't impossible and Descartes wants to be certain and second (strong reply) if it were true that humans all evolved from the same ancestors and human minds were evolved to work well in their environment not to be oracles of truth, then the independence of conclusions he claims is false because our conclusions aren't independent.
This combined with other bad arguments about free will make me wonder if motivated reasoning was the primary drive and not philosophy.
Worst Daniel Dennett book by far.
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.