Comprehensive

There are a few topics that get short shrift in Asbridge's account, like the Albigensien Crusade and the People's Crusade. But if you want a comprehensive history of the wars fought in the Middle East, he's your guy. Asbridge writes with great narrative pace without sacrificing detail; he clarifies both the complex political history of Outremer and the moment-by-moment action of the great battles and sieges. The story is filled with great personalities - Saladin, Richard Lionheart, the sad Louis King of France, the brutal Baybars. A final chapter reflects on how the crusades have been used as reference points in later history. Derek Perkins' reading is brisk and interesting.

84 people found this helpful

Learned more from this than in the past 60 years.

This book taught me more than just about any other historical piece I have read. It manages to masterfully put the Crusades in a format that shows the personalities on both sides that created the political conditions that fueled the hundred years of violence between two competing religions, philosophies and political systems for dominance of Palestine and its religious sites, holy to both sides.

69 people found this helpful

A Thorough Look

A very interesting listen. Nice job connecting the history of the Crusades with other events going on, both at the time of the Crusades as well as since.

34 people found this helpful

Get an old map

I really enjoyed this book!. I did need an old (Time/year specific) map to really understand where the countries/cities were and their relationships to where people traveled. The first few hours of listening were a little difficult as the names were 'new" to my ears. After reviewing a map and understanding the names the book became a GREAT listen. Understanding who and why from most sides of 200+ years of Duking (pun intended) it out. We really never learn from the past, just relive it thinking we are better and smarter. I am glad I did not live beck then as life was very much harder than listening to true stories on a cruise ship.

18 people found this helpful

Crash course on the Crusades

If you could sum up The Crusades in three words, what would they be?

Very detailed, well written narrative on an intriguing period where Christianity first developed a theological war doctrine and applied it vigorously.

What did you like best about this story?

What struck me was the general ineffectiveness of the Crusades. Basically, only the First Crusade was a real, striking success, conquering Jerusalem against all odds. The Third Crusade was somewhat of a success, gaining the Crusaders Acre. The rest ranged from minor failures to complete failures.

Which character – as performed by Derek Perkins – was your favorite?

I was enamored by Richard the Lionheart, especially how he outsmarted Saladin. Baybars was effective in his campaigns. He shone in his use of communications; using fast messengers on horseback and deception.

Was there a moment in the book that particularly moved you?

The two failed Crusades to Egypt were particularly heart-wrenching.

Any additional comments?

What irritated me somewhat was the ignorance of the writer on Islamic law. He writes that Greater Jihad (ie, the internal battle for one's own soul, الجِهاد الأَكْبَر) is the jihad that is written about in the Qu'ran. This is plainly wrong. Most references to jihad in the Qu'ran and Hadith are about the Lesser Jihad (الجِهاد الأَصْغَر), which is the one all kufar should be aware of.

The author seems to take the time to linger on Crusader atrocities, but quickly skips over Muslim atrocities or refers to the tit-for-tat character of it, even if 100 years after. This way of looking at crimes is very similar to the modern 'soft bigotry of lower expectations' where westerners are held to other standards than non-westerns.

Mention is made by the author that the Crusades were unilateral aggression by the Crusaders. The fact that Christianity had to suffer for over 4 centuries of relentless aggression by Muslim invasions and conquests is waved away.

If you do not care for the Author's personal opinion on this matter, be sure to skip the last chapter.

151 people found this helpful

A comprehensive window into the past

This book takes the listener back in time to the period of the great Crusades into the Holy land. Told from both sides of the story, it links these events into todays chaotic Middle East, and gives perspective into one of the basic causes for the Protestant Reformation a few centuries later. Derek Perkins handles the Arabic names with ease and his delivery is first rate. Of particular interest to me was the telling of the story of the Mongol invasion and how they were blunted by the Muslim world in the Middle East.
All in all a great listen for those who want to get deep into this topic to understand its causes and effects.

5 people found this helpful

Solid and objective history with minor innacuracie

Really good, with well researched and objective content. However, there are a few small problems. The author gets the characteristics of European arms and armor completely wrong. He says that mail was very poor armor, when in fact it is very effective, taking tremendously powerful hits and keeping the wearer safe. His view of European swords is also wrong, viewing them as crowbars rather than the agile weapons they truly are. This shows a disturbing lack of personal research of the primary sources. All one has to do is read contemporary accounts and handle accurate reproductions to know how wrong this segment was.
Also, the author consistently mentions different units of currency throughout the book but with no comparison of the currency or what a unit of the currency was worth. This information might be in the physical book.

32 people found this helpful

Profound Narrative with Modern World Impact

Would you recommend this audiobook to a friend? If so, why?

I have recommended this audiobook to friends, who like me, appreciate in-depth research presented authoritatively in easily-digested narrative.

What did you like best about this story?

I enjoyed the detailed accounts of the actors, attitudes, motivations and locations of the events we know as the Crusades, presented from Western AND Muslim points of view.

What does Derek Perkins bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

Derek Perkins' proper pronunciation helped greatly in my understanding of the material as I followed his narration in the hard-copy book. His pronunciation of French and Arabic names aided in a more thorough understanding of the historic figures and Middle Eastern locations of the Crusades.

Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?

Though this book provoked no extreme reactions like laughter or tears, I came away with a feeling of complete satisfaction for having spent the time listening to the accounts of a two hundred year span of human history.

15 people found this helpful

Very good, but...

Performance is superb and research, storytelling, and putting it all together are very well done. Opened my eyes to a new viewpoint on pre-crusades and arguments on whether or not Muslim aggression sparked the crusades. Didn’t really care for the ending. Author felt he needed to do a little Bush bashing. He always strives to give context to Islamic actions, but isn’t willing to be that generous for contemporary Western actions. Should’ve and could’ve just left that whole part out.

60 people found this helpful

Informative but vague on details.

Great if you want a series of events with a timeline but lacks in depth events and detail. I also felt the author was bias in his opinions on certain events against the Latin crusaders. It came off more as a history and evolution of Islam and the Middle East during the crusades rather than a History of the Crusades.

8 people found this helpful