A Tedious Political Romp Against America

Another leftist diatribe by a pontificating blowhard, no thanks.

You know you're listening to some unobjective rant when the author lambasts the US for "tearing children from their <illegal immigrant> families" but fails to register one complaint about the brutal human rights abuses and Orwellian construct by the Chinese themselves.

I'm so sick and tired of this leftist bias in everything. The title should be changed because it really has very little to do with the "Silk Roads." May I suggest "Sulking Toads"? If you want to understand China today then read the "China Vision" by Daniel Wagner or "On China" by Kissinger.

12 people found this helpful

Not at par with The Silk Roads

I expected a book that would extend the author’s previous one. While this one discusses more recent events (up to summer 2018 or so), it does so more in a fashion of providing facts, rather than putting them within the framework of the historical ebb and flows caused by and observed at “the silk roads”. This book could be followed with another one in 4-5 years, with more updates and so on (which I would read, to be honest.)
It’s also heavy on facts and episodes known to everyone who follows US politics since 2016, to emphasize the lack of comprehensive US foreign policy, and contrast it with the approach of Russia & China.
Overall useful, but I found the previous one much more instructive and (even) fascinating.

4 people found this helpful

Nonsensical stupid rant

It is an absolute nonexistent history.. it is basically based on would have happened by Chinese mind rather what really happened..so stupid and none sense..

3 people found this helpful

A metaphor for Asian trade, not the road itself

An interesting discussion of foreign trade, politics and military issues especially in Asia, however, it takes the Silk Road more as a metaphor than an actual Chinese program of interconnected links, describing the strategy behind the total system. I didn't care for the style of the reader but that is a personal taste.

3 people found this helpful

If you read international news, you don’t need to read this book

If you have paid attention to international news since 2015 and care about international relations you will gain next-to-nothing from reading this book. It is a breakdown of fairly evident stuff, plus a bunch of Trump bashing for not maintaining America’s position in the world. At the beginning of the book Frankopan muses about how he wanted to add an appendix to his last book, but he realized there was too much information. I disagree. This information would have been more poignant as an appendage to his original work. It was not insightful or even really interesting as a stand alone book, especially when compared with “The Silk Roads”.

2 people found this helpful

Thorough Coverage

Great analysis of the current shifts in the world economy and geopolitics, drawing upon numerous historical and contemporary examples. However, at times the book felt repetitive, addressing the same silk road themes multiple times but using different examples. This could have been intentional to drive home the messages presented in the text.

2 people found this helpful

Quickly Outdated

Much of the content deals with Trump administration international relations. Those were obviously hugely important at the time, but they're less pertinent now that his presidency is done. There is still a lot of great content, but it already feels dated in some of the IR discussions.

1 person found this helpful

Good Followup to Silk Roafs

The two "Silk Road" volumes correct a long standing imbalance in world history which has tilted towards emphasizing the West at the expense of the East.

1 person found this helpful

Simply great

I love this book since it gives a very thru hightlights of the developments, social and miliatry

An essay

Good and clear writing. Felt as if it was too long of an essay though. I liked the thesis, but felt it could have been condensed into a featured article/essay of something like The Economist.